The Disreputable History of Frankie Landau-Banks by E. Lockhart

The Disreputable History of Frankie Landau-Banks by E. Lockhart

Overall Rating: 4.5/5

Quality of Prose: 4.5/5

Quality of Story: 4.5/5

Quality of Characters: 4.5/5

Ability to Make the Audience Think/Feel Differently: 4.5/5

How Long It Took Me to Finish: 2 days

A 1 Sentence Summary

Frankie Landau-Banks, infiltrates a boy’s-only-secret-society at her uppity New England boarding school and attempts to dismantle the “Old Boys’ Club” atmosphere of her school and the patriarchy itself.

My Favorite Quotes

“Matthew had called her harmless. Harmless. And being with him made Frankie feel squashed into a box–a box where she was expected to be sweet and sensitive (but not oversensitive); a box for young and pretty girls who were not as bright or powerful as their boyfriends. A box for people who were not forces to be reckoned with. Frankie wanted to be a force.”

“It is better to be alone, she figures, than to be with someone who can’t see who you are. It is better to lead than to follow. It is better to speak up than stay silent. It is better to open doors than to shut them on people. She will not be simple and sweet. She will not be what people tell her to be.”

“In some ways, we can see Frankie Landau-Banks as a neglected positive. A buried word. A word inside another word that’s getting all the attention. A mind inside a body that’s getting all the attention. Frankie’s mind is a word overlooked, but when uncovered–through invention, imagination, or recollection–it wields a power that is comical, surprising, and memorable.”

disrep history

What I Loved About It

This book is the ultimate teen-girl (and all women everywhere, really) feminist manifesto. E. Lockhart is seriously one of THE most talented YA authors out there. Her books are always witty and sharp (in a funny way, like in The Boyfriend List or The Disreputable History, or in a disturbing way, like in We Were Liars or Genuine Fraud). They always feature amazingly complex, strong, and still “girly” and feminine main characters who the audience often can’t help but to respect but also fear (though the question Lockhart repeatedly asks through these characters is: do we fear these girls because they don’t follow the social rules we often expect girls to follow? And: if a male character did or said the same things would we be as disturbed by them?).

It’s amazing that Lockhart can address these deeper ideas and create these complex and amazing characters (and write a freaking feminist manifesto) while still building a world and a story that is funny and interesting, filled with boarding school hi jinx and high school pranks and teenage romance, a world and story that teenaged readers would be so unbelievably engaged in.

One of my most favorite qualities of this book is the matter-of-fact storytelling nature of the prose. In the novel, Frankie finds the book written by members of her school’s secret boys-only society titled, The Disreputable History of the Loyal Order of the Bassett Hounds detailing all of the society’s various pranks, hi jinx, and activities. The novel itself is written in such a way as to suggest that it is Frankie’s own Disreputable History book, with prose that speaks directly to the reader and uses pronouns like “I,” with entire chapters that include hilarious grammar lessons (about neglected positives, which I now find to be incredibly funny) and excerpts from Frankie’s school essays and pieces of evidence that link her to her many crimes. It’s such a unique storytelling style that isn’t used in YA lit enough and that would certainly interest teen readers.

I seriously can not stress enough how amazing this book is. The Disreputable History of Frankie Landau-Banks is the perfect blend of the fun of her Ruby Oliver novels and the depth and provocative nature of her more “serious” novels, We Were Liars and Genuine Fraud. This is pretty evident in that the novel has, deservingly, won a bajillion awards.  It’s the kind of book that makes me desperately wish I had the depth of mind and writing abilities to write, a book that, while interesting and fun and witty, makes a reader think and question and affect social change.

What My Students Could Learn From It

There are, sadly, not enough YA books that appeal to students’ more shallow interests (romance and humor and rebellion) and that also make them think deeply about social issues. But all of E. Lockhart’s books do. She is such a literary genius. Frankie Landau-Banks is a protagonist my students need to read about–a teen who cares about social issues and wants to affect social change, who is a free thinker and a leader, who is intelligent and funny and sharp, but also who, unlike the characters in a lot of John Green books, is an authentic and realistic teenager.

Reading about Frankie’s efforts to escape the panopticon, to force her way into a social group she has been barred entry from, and her frustration at the lack of care her classmates have for these things would provoke my students to really think about their own social lives and the social rules they are following simply because they think they have to, because they think they are being watched.

Most teenagers are followers. It’s simply the phase of everyone’s life where they are so desperate to belong, to fit in, and to continue the social status quo. But reading this book could maybe give students the courage to lead instead of follow and to not cower in the face of the high school social strata.

The novel would get students thinking about society and socialization in general but would also be a great first foray into feminism without being preachy or overt or whine-y.

I seriously cannot stop raving about this book. So go buy it and read it and share it with your students! You won’t be disappointed!

 

Advertisements
Emmy & Oliver by Robin Benway

Emmy & Oliver by Robin Benway

Overall Rating: 2.5/5

Quality of Prose: 3/5

Quality of Story: 3/5

Quality of Characters: 2/5

Ability to Make the Audience Think/Feel Differently: 1.5/5

How Long It Took Me to Finish: 5 days

A 1 Sentence Summary

When Emmy’s childhood best friend, Oliver, returns home after being missing for 10 years because his father kidnapped him, Emmy & Oliver reconnect, fall in love, and learn to be true to themselves despite what their parents want for them.

My Favorite Quote

“I just hugged him and didn’t say anything. There wasn’t anything to say. Sometimes there just aren’t enough words to fill the cracks in your heart.”

emmy

What I Loved About It

It’s a really interesting premise, exploring the aftermath of a biological parent kidnapping situation. I also thought Oliver was a really interesting character that kept me reading so I could learn more about him. But I thought that Benway kept something that could have dove really deep into some serious issues (I mean just imagine being kidnapped by your own parent while your other parent searches everywhere for you without you knowing. That is some messed up stuff!) very lighthearted and surface level. Emmy and Oliver fall in love and Emmy learns to tell her parents the truth about who she is because of him and that’s all nice and fluffy, but OLIVER WAS KIDNAPPED BY HIS DAD and why is this book so light and chill considering its subject matter?

Also, why does it mostly center on Emmy? I found myself caring very little about Emmy’s petty “I just want to surf but it’s dangerous so I can’t tell my parents about it” drama. Oliver was kidnapped and is trying to adjust to life with a mom that he doesn’t know because his dad took him from her and he misses his dad and this is some heavy stuff but for some reason it isn’t given the proper amount of heaviness in the novel. It also ends in a very happy “life is good” kind of way, and I just don’t think it’d be that easy for Oliver to adjust and cope after dealing with something like that.

I also feel like Benway’s prose is really good sometimes, and other times is trying way too hard to be funny or deep or relatable, and to me the trying-too-hard-ness was really obvious and took away from the book as a whole.

Overall, I liked this book. It was entertaining and fun. But the problem is that I don’t think it should be a fun book considering the subject matter.

What My Students Could Learn From It

Be true to yourself. Don’t just become who your parents want you to be, but forge a new path for yourself. All that tired teen trope jazz. Nothing much deeper than that.

Our Chemical Hearts by Krystal Sutherland

Our Chemical Hearts by Krystal Sutherland

Overall Rating: 3.5/5

Quality of Prose: 4/5

Quality of Story: 3/5

Quality of Characters: 3/5

Ability to Make the Audience Think/Feel Differently: 4/5

How Long It Took Me To Finish: 3 days

A 1 Sentence Summary

Henry Page falls in (mostly unrequited) love for the first time with the mysterious Grace Town, who is in love with someone else, her boyfriend of many years who has recently died.

My Favorite Quotes

“When I look up into the night sky, I remember that I’m nothing but the ashes of long-dead stars. A human being is a collection of atoms that comes together into an ordered pattern for a brief period of time and then falls apart again. I find comfort in my smallness.”

“Because I never realized that you could fall in love with humans the same way you fall in love with songs. How the tune of them could mean nothing to you at first, an unfamiliar melody, but quickly turn into a symphony carved across your skin; a hymn in the web of your veins; a harmony stitched into the lining of your soul.”

ourchemicalhearts

What I Loved About It

Krystal Sutherland’s writing is very John Green-esque. The prose–and especially the dialogue–is incredibly witty and sharp, and it also has a depth to it that many young adult books are lacking these days. It gets you thinking about life, death, and love in a way that you hadn’t previously.

It’s those two things that I really liked about this book. The dialogue, which was chock-full of hilarious references and smart comebacks, was extremely fun to read at times.

Here’s a cool example:

The main character, Henry says, “This is the second straight hour I’ve been listening to Taylor Swift. She’s the only one who understands me…Who hurt you, Taylor? How can one person endure so much heartbreak?” to which his sister replies, “Are you gonna keep this bottled up inside until it manifests as mental illness?” to which he says, “That’s pretty much the plan.” His sister: “How long have you been lying in that bed for, anyway? You’re going to get deep vein thrombosis.” Henry: “Leave, Sadie. Leave me to my heartache and DVT.”

This funny exchange is immediately followed by a deep heart-to-heart covering love and what it means when a love isn’t forever and the chemical reaction in your brain when love fails and your heart is breaking.

The whole book is full of these funny exchanges and cool (and extremely current) pop culture references and quotable quotes about love and death (like the ones I included above under “My Favorite Quotes”).

And while I loved all these things about the book, there were things I didn’t love as well. I didn’t particularly like the characters. I supposed I liked the supporting characters (Henry’s sister and friends, etc.). They were hilarious and endearing and fun in their eccentricity. But Henry and Grace? I just could not root for either of them. Henry was naive to the point of annoyance, and Grace was frustrating and unappealing and even a little cruel. And I guess that’s the point. Doesn’t love make you naive? And doesn’t grief make you cruel? This isn’t supposed to be a love story you root for, but instead a case study on how first love (or really any love) doesn’t usually last, and how do we react when it doesn’t or when we’re in the midst of it but know it won’t last?

What My Students Could Learn From It

Another cool thing about this book is how realistic of a depiction it provides for teenage relationships. Henry’s obsession with becoming Grace Town’s boyfriend even though he practically knows nothing about her and only finds her attractive 20% of the time? Yeah that’s pretty realistic. Take it from someone who spends 8 hours a day with hormonal, relationship and “love”-driven teenagers. The obsession is so real. I think kids can learn from how Henry’s obsession pans out.

Other than that, I don’t think there are many clear cut lessons to learn from Our Chemical Hearts. Sutherland asks a lot of questions and starts a lot of conversations and encourages thought about a lot of things (with those magic John Green-esque quotable quotes), but doesn’t provide many clear “morals of the story.” Her ambiguity is refreshing. I think teens would appreciate the depth of some of the quotes and dialogue found in the novel, and it would get them thinking about a lot of things. And as their teacher, that’s definitely something I want novels they read to do.